by
svjohnny
on Tue 03 Oct 2006 09:47 PM EDT
Made it back to the hotel early tonight, around 8:30. It’s weird being so busy and all of a sudden
feeling like you have all this free time. So what better way to spend it than to blog
down a couple thoughts.
The vital task weighing down on us this week is the big
meeting scheduled for next Monday morning. Since we always fly back to NY on Thursday
night, we try to finish all our work before leaving the client site. What we have to prepare for this meeting with
the big shots of the organization, is a summary of what we’ve done so far and
where we’re heading. So yes, our work is
essentially preparing a PowerPoint presentation for our client (who will
continue this project) after we consultants leave.
So how is making a presentation so time consuming and how is
that considered real work? Well, I had
this conversation with our project leader yesterday. While the medium is PowerPoint, the
deliverable is actual data and know-how. The deliverable is a set of slides that act as
documentation. And in the process of
making it, we gather information, crunch numbers, and persuade various groups to
do their jobs and hand over the necessary information.
On a side note, I am experiencing first hand how scarily
competent my colleagues are at PowerPoint and Excel. I saw it in action in b-school, but these
folks put me to shame. I feel slow like molasses
when I operate, compared to these guys working their shortcuts, macros, and
personalized toolbars. My analogy from
b-school to here is like learning the Dark side of the Force, powerful,
sinister, and no turning back.
Now about our client, I’ve made one observation, specifically
the person in charge of the program we’re putting in place, who will be
delivering the presentation, is a perceived lack of interaction. The consultants were in the office until
midnight yesterday while the client clocked out around 6. The result is that we make a lot of decisions
about what to present and how to present it. Not only that, but I’m gaining a lot of on
hand experience that will be essential after I leave. It leaves me scratching my head a little. After all, should they risk taking the chance of not learning
everything that’s necessary to sustain the project?
Again, I asked my project leader and he said most of the
clients are slightly more interactive, but not by much. They have to lead their own lives, whereas
our day (and night?) job is to be in the office for countless hours. And it’s a shame that we do a lot of things
they’ll never learn, but that’s their choice. I secretly wonder if that’s a result of my
client’s industry, one whose culture is comparatively conservative and slow moving. For certain, Silicon
Valley start-ups can’t run this way. Then again, it’s not clear to me how many
high-tech start-ups hire consultants. I
would imagine that they would expect the consultants to work in parallel,
probably working on market strategy or customer analysis.